#Far cry 4 map update#
So what was in that patch? no one knows other then yes it broke the map edit program for the steam version, uplay users around that week did get a title update that only added some Chinese language support. and thats the same version steam, users have ) the game stayed the same at version 1.10.0.
#Far cry 4 map Patch#
as they are the ones who released their own version of a patch in march 2019 (uplay only users did not get this patch or any update. Originally posted by SmellyFinger78:same when i did that, honestly is just bs that ubisoft havnt fixed this issue and what a pain in the ass it is to fix it its up to STEAM to fix. Originally posted by -=SOF=-WID99:it is a well KNOWN issue that steam has NEVER corrected See also these posts about the map editor issue (thanks to _DATBOIDUCK for finding the solution.) see this post, you may need to remove a reg entry due to a failed steam update in late march 2019 (it did not effect all steam users. Its also listed in the troubleshooting tips pinned topicĭownload the updated Uplay launcher from the Uplay web page Would Far Cry Primal be a better game if it's map was further differentiated from that of Far Cry 4? It's doubtful, but there's a sense that if practices like this are accepted, it will only lead to further shortcuts that might actually detract from the finished product's quality.įar Cry Primal is available now for PlayStation 4, Xbox One, and PC.It is a well KNOWN issue that steam has NEVER corrected Consumers want more than a simple re-skin of previous content - but, as video game budgets continue to rise, there's a limit to what can be done given the confines of money and time. There's a question of worth and value to be asked regarding Far Cry Primal. That game re-used elements from the prior game liberally, but given that it was a budget release that made enormous visual and tonal leaps from its launching pad, fans were generally more willing to accept that fact. This wasn't the case for its predecessor, Far Cry 3 follow-up Blood Dragon. Though the game is considered to be a side-story, rather than a numbered sequel, it was released as a fully priced title. Primal launched to fairly positive reviews in late February, with the bulk of complaints referring to its lack of any major innovation. This information shouldn't really be taken as a criticism of the game itself - although it's sure to provide fuel for Ubisoft's tendency to cut corners on some of its releases. In fact, most players perhaps wouldn't make the conclusion for themselves without seeing the maps side by side. While the heightmap seems to have been recycled between the two games, it's not quite accurate to say that Ubisoft has simply re-used the same setting, as some major changes have been made. It should be noted that, despite major similarities, this doesn't seem to be a copy-and-paste situation. The similarities between the two are most clear when comparing bodies of water, as is proven by images released by Game Pressure.
New evidence seems to suggest that the map used in Far Cry Primal is largely based on that of its predecessor. However, it seems like one element of the game isn't all too different from Far Cry 4. The recently released Far Cry Primal offered a different spin on the series' well-entrenched formula, placing players in a Stone Age setting where their guns are swapped for sharpened sticks and animal companions. Newly uncovered evidence suggests that Far Cry Primal re-uses the map from its predecessor, prompting fans to criticize Ubisoft for cutting corners.
0 kommentar(er)
